|
|
Got to Be kidding
said:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
... You have to be kidding me that WSI would even consider paying these phone bills and other charges that were run up by Indvik. How insane. I wonder, are they going to pay current and former employees for the minutes they have used on personal cell phones for work related business while being an employee of WSI? This does happen from time to time. I highly doubt it. How much more ridiculous can this thing get before someone with some authority steps in and stops it? On those phone bills also what business did Indvik have calling Blunt while he was on administrative leave? He is on leave he should not have been consulted for anything by anyone at WSI which we know is not the case but he should have been disbarred in the same fashion Mr. Long has been. First we pay Blunt and Leingang for wrong doings and now they possibly reward (if they pay these bills) an incompitent snow blow operator playing board chairman for being an idiot also. Wow. The thing I find intriguing is this is just his work issued cell phone. What kinds of information would show up if a person looked at his office phone number and if you could get his home phone information. You can't tell me that he only did this kind of stuff from his work issued cell phone. |
|
|
Tongue in Cheek? I'm thinking maybe Jim Poolman's consulting company can handle the investigation, since he is an expert on insurance regulation. Maybe Indvik can resign from the board, then get hired as a consultant to WSI, and then make some big bucks so he can pay back Botno County. |
|
|
Interesting turn of events Well, well, isn't this interesting. The Williston Herald has an AP story posted to their website stating that the SAO, in consultation with the AG, will be handling the investigation into Indvik's cell phone bill and county vehicle use. Wonder if WSI will have second thoughts about paying Indvik's cell phone bill now that the SAO is involved. I'd sure like to have been a mouse in the corner when Indvik heard that piece of news. |
|
|
... More than a decade ago, I saw the bullet proof lobby at WSI, along with the bomb threat protocol in the lobby, when I went there with my future husband because of his profound frustration with worker's comp. I had recently begun to follow ND politics and was entranced by the appearance of open government such as at state legislative hearings. WSI's lobby made my jaw drop. What, I wondered, are they afraid of? |
|
|
To Sheri I think it was printed a few years ago that wsi built the bullit proof building because they said-- they meaning wsi-- needed protection from workers that were making fraudulent injury claims--the building was opened up a few months after hireing blunt- it was the begaining of their start of really denying claims-bring in out of state mouth pieces to help in denying claims-the oir board denying claims--it was'nt long after opening the doors that the people inside the bullit proof building nolonger had a face or last name--it was the beginning of their multi-million dollar non-profit enterprize-an the end of injured worker being treated fairly--the beginning of the untouchables!! |
|
|
The System In my opinion, If you checked the records of everyone who has a work phone issued to them. you might find Bob Indvik isn't the only one. I bet close to 99% are in violation some way or another. I like the onward and upward approach, verses the who did what. The State and the people of the state have a lot to learn. Let the people who lost thier jobs fend for themselves like I do. Fair is fair, and fired is fired. treat them all the same and move on. The long term solution should be the topic of discussion,And not who did what. Lets see who can come up with the best Idea to solve the problem. I am not on anyones side on this and I really don't care about the past. I think it's time to shift gears from reverse to foreward. |
|
|
Eliminate the board, fire the WSI execs and return accountability is the solution. People may make personal calls on a company issued cell phone, but I don't care if its a private company, what I care about is the number of calls that aren't related to Bottineau County. Why didn't Indvik reimburse the county, did he ever have the intention to? Why so many calls, why to people who were no longer on the board and why for such long periods of time. The large number of calls is what is concerning to me. The long term solution is easy in my opinion, get rid of the inept corrupt board and return WSI back to control and oversight of an elected official. Its also the hypocricy that Indvik displays, he criticizes others for doing what he himself was doing. The bunker mentality of him and the rest of the board and their way of dealing with problems by blaming others is the problem. In my opinion, he never had any intention of reimbursing Bottineau County until he got caught. If he would of, he would have made monthly payments to the county. |
|
|
You Have To Know A lot of the blogs criticize the injured workers as being whiners or losers just trying to get a easy buck all the while we have just been trying to tell everyone just how we are being treated-just think that the way wsi has been treating the Governor-AG-BHP and their own people just imagine how they really treat the injured worker and we do'nt ever get to see their faces-i'm also for Truth's idea but it has to be from the claims manager up-i've talked to my states rep a long time ago -even back then he knew wsi was bad-this what i really do'nt understand-all these people knew about how bad wsi is an nobody did anything-the thought that goes threw my mind is that "THERE JUST INJURED WORKERS" why bother they'll soon be out of money an wo'nt be able to appeal an then they'll just go away-why not it's worked for years.For the pro-wsi people you just make me want to PUKE a bunch of gutless spineless bottom feeders--feeding off the injured and poor have a merry x-mas. |
|
|
A Great Idea What Mr. Ed Christensen wrote today(12-26-07) in the bismarck tribune under opinions an letters is a great idea-theres just a couple of problems with it--one is finding three honest people picked by the governor-an the second thing is that wsi will never go for it-wsi has no intensions of overturning any decisions of any claims for anybody period-but it's a great idea. |
|
|
Conflict of Interest for Some, But Not for Others Hey Chad, Isn't your wife the counsel for the workers comp committee for the LC? Why doesn't she ever do anything? More like isn't it a conflict of interest for you? |
|
|
Give it up Should we talk about your family, "Ryan"??? Been off limits 'till now. Get ready for the 15th, man. |
|
|
No conflict of interest Chet is not a legislator or a public official, so there is no conflict of interest. Ryan, why don't you pose the same question to Steve Cates about one of h is contributors to his publication. Remember Patty Armstrong is the wife of WSI comm exec Mark Armstrong, don't you see that as a confilict for the trash that Steve Cates put forth in his articles when he was trying to bad mouth former employees? Have you criticized him? Have you asked him about it? I'm willing to guess not, because it doesn't suit your cause. If its a conflict for Chet, then its a conflict for Cates as well, lets see you post that on his site. |
|
