|
WSI Initiated Measure Petition |
|
|
|
A blog of all sections with no images
|
Written by Adam
|
|
Wednesday, 14 May 2008 |
|
This man has no clue, does he? From Yahoo! News: US President George W. Bush said in an interview out Tuesday that he quit playing golf in 2003 out of respect for the families of US soldiers killed in the conflict in Iraq, now in its sixth year. "I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal," he said in an interview for Yahoo! News and Politico magazine. "I don't want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the commander-in-chief playing golf," he said. "I feel I owe it to the families to be in solidarity as best as I can with them." Unbelievable. 4077 of our brothers and sisters and sons and daughters and mothers and fathers and friends and neighbors die, and our president gives up golf. This man is the modern version of James Buchanan. Except James Buchanan didn't torture anyone to prevent the southern secession. It's official, Bush is officially the worst president in American history. If there was any doubt, this was it. Buchanan was an idiot, but Bush is an idiot that who has no clue what the American families that are suffering under his idiocy feel. I could care less what the president does on the occasion he decides to relax. A good leader needs to be able to on occasion get out and rest his mind. What matters are the decisions you make on the job. You want to really show “solidarity” with the families of the soldiers that are losing life and limb, how about showing that you know what the hell is going on? How about making sure personally that our troops are cared for when they are injured? How about making sure that they dont have their bonuses revoked when they can't fulfill their full three year commitment because they died in combat? How about giving them a good education? How about bringing them home? How about giving a damn! In the impeccable words of Keith Olbermann, “Shut the hell up!” |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Wednesday, 14 May 2008 |
|
Here's the recent morale survey for North Dakota's Worforce Safety and Insurance (WSI). (click here) I'm still to busy to blog, so I'm just going to post this and let you guys comment. I've skimmed it and there's some interesting stuff in there. I also want to point out that John Hoeven has been rated, by Playboy magazine, as the 12th sexiest governor in the United States. I guess I'm not sure how they were able to rate a guy who spends all his time hiding under his desk. And, considering Minnesota Governor (and John McAngry's possible V.P. running mate) Tim Pawlenty's recent comments about his wife, it's no surprise he didn't make the list. |
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Wednesday, 14 May 2008 |
|
Later today the Democratic National Convention Committee will announce that NorthDecoder.com will be the one and only credentialed blog from North Dakota at the convention in late August. Here's a snippet from the e-mail I just received: [M]embers of the State Blogger Corps will be seated alongside their delegations at the Convention. You’ll literally have one of the best seats in the house. And we expect that you’ll share that up-front view with your online community of readers and other bloggers. Together, we’ll make sure this Democratic Convention is seen and experienced online in more ways than ever before. Let’s start with some content you can post on your own blog. Howard Dean was in Denver yesterday and he recorded a video message introducing the State Blogger corps. (from an e-mail I received)
Here's the video clip: We've asked for credentials for three people, total. Hopefully all three of us will get credentialed. We'll keep you posted. If they've got the tech infrastructure set up in the Pepsi Center, I'd like to webcast live video feeds from the convention floor, kind of like what we did from the North Dakota convention in Grand Forks. I'd also like to do little video interviews and see if I can get delegation members to volunteer to write diary-like entries to tell us about their experiences at the convention and in Denver. I'm not exactly sure how I'm going to get to Denver. There's been some talk of possibly car-pooling. If anybody out there has any interest in carpooling down to Denver, let me know. |
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Tuesday, 13 May 2008 |
|
I just can't resist this. The blogosphere has been abuzz since yesterday with talk of the new House Republican "motto" coming out of D.C. Here's the story:
It looks like Republicans will counter the Democratic push for change from the years of the Bush administration with their own pledge to deliver, drum roll please, “the change you deserve.” The first element of the party agenda developed over the past few months by the leadership and select party members will focus on family issues. “Through our “Change You Deserve” message and through our “American Families Agenda,” House Republicans will continue our efforts to speak directly to an American public looking for leaders who will offer real solutions for the challenges they confront every day,” said the memo prepared for lawmakers. NY Times (The Caucus blog)
So why is the blogosphere abuzz with the House GOP's motto? Here's the fun part: According to Wikipedia, the prescription drug "Venlafaxine is used primarily for the treatment of depression, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder in adults." The brand name version, Effexor, is sold by Wyeth, which marketed it using the slogan, "The Change You Deserve™." According to a December 2007 Alternet article, Are You One of Big Pharma's Lab Animals?, the drug company's ad agency came up with this marketing slant: Wyeth's ad agency serenaded the nation with the message in its "The Change You Deserve™" campaign that, if we were not enjoying things the way we used to do, if we were lacking in what agencies used to call get-up-and-go, it was time to go on the antidepressant Effexor.
"The Change You Deserve™" was trademarked by Wyeth, so we're wondering if that will be a problem for the NRCC, regardless of the unfortunate analogy between its political fortunes and the genuine suffering that plagues people experiencing depression. BluestemPrairie
The Republicans have chosen as their motto a trademarked ad slogan for an antidepressant. The Republican Party is officially a parody of itself. You deserve a better change. |
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Saturday, 10 May 2008 |
|
Speaking of Ed Schafer -- North Dakota's most famous former governor and repeat plagiarist -- here's a snippet from something found on the USA News & World Report website this week: With a résumé like Ed Schafer's, President Bush could have picked the former two-term North Dakota governor, boyhood farmer, telecommunications exec, conservationist, Junkyard Wars runner-up, and classic car and tractor restorer to run any of about six cabinet agencies. But it was the Agriculture Department Schafer wanted. "This is a good fit," he tells us. Winning kudos for being a tireless worker (he works out early and regularly skips lunch) and straight shooter (Congress sometimes "drives me crazy"), Schafer is fast becoming a key point man for Bush on the pending farm bill and trade deals. "This is a 110 percent job," he says. USA News (emphasis added)
If you click on the graphic above, you'll get a bigger version of that aerial photograph. Ed Schafer's boyhood "farm" is in the picture. I bet you can't guess which "farm" is the "farm" of Ed Schafer's "boyhood farming" days. For the record, Schafer claims to have "spent summers [on his grandfather's farm in Hettinger County] while growing up." (click here) If that's the standard for being able to claim one was a "boyhood farmer," then I'm a boyhood farmer too. Any other "city kids" out there who were "boyhood farmers" like me and Ed? Maybe Schafer "wrote" the US News story himself. Embarassing. |
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Saturday, 10 May 2008 |
|
Three junior high school students from small-town Minnesota found themselves on the wrong side of the law this week.
Three eighth-graders at Dilworth-Glyndon-Felton Junior High spent Thursday in in-school suspension for sitting down during the pledge of allegiance.
Brandt Dahl said his homeroom teacher had never before told the class that the school handbook required students to stand up during the pledge. The 13-year-old and two female students remained in their seats while classmates recited the pledge.Principal Colleen Houglum, who was observing the class that morning, told those three students to report to the office, according to students’ accounts of what happened. “At first, everyone thought that she was joking,” said Bishop Edens, a 14-year-old student in the class. “But after a few seconds, she got a little angry and said report to the office now.” Fargo Forum So... There's no doubt these kids should get in trouble. The last thing this country needs right now is for kids to learn at an early age that they can speak out about their government. Best to whip these punks into shape before they get too wiley. Who cares what the first amendment says!?! |
|
Written by Adam
|
|
Friday, 09 May 2008 |
|
Well there goes bipartisanship... From MPR: President George Bush had threatened for months to veto the farm bill. He said it fails to reform farm subsidy programs. Late this afternoon USDA Secretary and North Dakota native Ed Schafer said the president would make good on his threat. Schafer said he met with Bush yesterday. "He was direct and clear," Schafer said. "The president will veto this bill." Well so much for that then... This bill has been in discussion for several months, close to a year. If you will remember, when Pomeroy was ambushed on the street by activists and said “I'm not going to impeach this clown” (to which some got angry for him calling bush a clown, I frankly was disappointed that he wasn't going to impeach the clown, but that's a different discussion.) He was talking on his cell phone discussing this very bill. That was back in august. The original bill expired in September and has been on life supporting continuing resolutions since then. This bill has the support of nearly every major farm state senator and has been extremely cooperative. Everyone from Dorgan to Harkin to Chambliss to Grassley supports it in the Senate, It also has broad support in the House as well (the chairs and ranking members of both the Senate and House Ag Committees are behind this legislation). Veto proof though? We'll see. Bush's reasoning for vetoing this important bill? Too expensive. Too expensive?!? This from a president that has spent more money than any Democrat would ever get away with. This from a president that after inheriting a budget surplus has put us 9.3 trillion in debt. This from a president that got us into a war that after interest will cost us $1.5 trillion (and that's if we pull out tomorrow, not to mention our hundred years strategy.) So let me get this straight. We can spend money on a war without end that profits nobody but Halliburton and Blackwater, let them charge us $45 for a case of soda, much of this money which we will never see again, thats OK. However, when we want to spend money on OUR farmers, and OUR children's healthcare, and OUR infrastructure, and OUR jobs, and OUR cities (say, New Orleans, which is still a disaster area), well that's just too damn expensive. I am fully convinced (as if I wasn't already) that the only thing Bush cares about at this point is keeping his pals flush with cash. I have seen nothing in this presidency to show that he believes otherwise. Nothing. And really at this point, why wouldn't he? He's managed to get away with it for this long, what's 256 more days? As for Shafer's role in all of this, I'm not sure what to think. He seems to be the messenger at this point, so I won't shoot him -- metaphorically -- yet. I'll be watching him though to see what he will be doing to move this bill along smoothly. |
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Wednesday, 07 May 2008 |
|
This morning, on "Good Morning America" (which I never watch), George Stephanopoulos apparently said this:
“More superdelegates will come out today for Barack Obama –they will come three, four, five at a time, and this nomination will be locked up.” Time.com
Wouldn't be surprised, but not holding my breath. |
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Tuesday, 06 May 2008 |
|
Well, the results are rolling in in Indiana and North Carolina tonight. The pundits all seem to be calling North Carolina for Sen. Barack Obama. Some pundits (like CBS News, I think) are calling Indiana for Sen. Hillary Clinton, but others (like MSNBC) are holding out, noting that some of the precincts not yet reporting are more populated areas that include potentially strong Obama precincts.
With 75% of the precincts reporting in Indiana, Clinton is leading 52% to 48%. Clinton leads by about 39,000. With 55% of the precincts reporting in North Carolina, Obama is leading 56% to 41%. Obama leads by about 149,000 votes in North Carolina. I'm pulling these numbers, FYI, from the WashingtonPost.com website at about 8:50 p.m., central time. |
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Monday, 05 May 2008 |
|
There's an Associated Press story in the Grand Forks Herald (and Bismarck Tribune) that's triggered a pet peeve reaction from me today. Here's a clip:
The attorney for a Fargo plastic surgeon suspended by the state medical board for allegedly drinking on the job says his client did consume alcohol that day. The March incident also wasn’t the first time William Yvorchuk’s behavior raised questions. On March 5, Yvorchuk completed two surgeries and was stopped from performing a third after lunch. His blood-alcohol level that afternoon was measured at 0.35, more than four times the legal limit, according to the state Board of Medical Examiners. Grand Forks Herald (emphasis added) So, apparently, the legal limit for the Blood Alcohol Content of a doctor who wishes to perform surgery is somewhere around .08. That would sure give me a lot of confidence in the folks who regulate the medical profession. Airline pilots are capped at a BAC of .04. But a doctor can operate on me up to .0799? No. That's absurd. I am not aware of a "legal limit" at which a doctor can no longer operate on a patient. I am also unaware of a "legal limit" above which I can no longer make a grilled-cheese sandwich. I know. It's knit-picky, but journalists do this way too often. There oughta be a "legal limit" to the number of times a journalist can suggest there's a "legal limit" for something when there isn't. |
|
|
Written by Adam
|
|
Monday, 05 May 2008 |
|
Wow, I really don't know what to say, Hillary. You've really dug yourself into a pretty deep hole on this one.... As you all have heard by now, Hillary Clinton has latched onto John McCain's worst economic idea yet. First off, that she would take her cues from John “I suck at economics” McCain, is bad enough, but that she would compound a dumb idea with a dumber idea is like the Lewis Black joke. “So a Republican gets up in congress and says 'I gotta really bad idea!' And the Democrat says 'And I can make it s$#ttier!'”This would be one of those ideas. You want me to explain? Alright, lets get the charts out here. This is economics 101. Here's a basic supply and demand graph from my microeconomics class. As you can see here, the market price is determined by two things: supply and demand. Buyers will demand certain quantities of a resource at a certain price. Sellers will sell certain quantities at certain prices. The point at which these two price/quantity combinations converge is called the equilibrium price level. That level determines the price for any given good or material. This chart (found here) shows what happens when external market forces (the government) try to lower the price below the equlibrium level. You create a shortage of the good or material because more of it is demanded than can be supplied at that level. As a result the price starts to go up and works its way back to the market equilibrium. So in our case, if we repeal the 18-cent federal gas tax (which if we implemented would save us all of 30 dollars a head on average) instead of cutting back on driving people would travel more because gas is cheaper, creating a higher demand for gas, which causes the price to go up, and oil companies absorb that as profit. You want the proof? I will show you using a perfect example that shows you why Obama is against the gas tax. He tried it when he was in the Illinois state senate! It turned out that the gas companies got richer off the deal and the roads, which the the gas tax money goes directly toward the repair of, suffered as a result of losing funding. He then voted against making the cut permanent because it fell flat on its face. Whaddaya know, he learned from his mistakes! Thats a good quality in a leader, don't ya think? So why are gas prices so high? As my financial accounting teacher always says, “What is something worth? Whatever some fool will pay for it!” There are actually a number of things that have caused oil and gas prices to spike as of late. They fit into two catergories: Supply problems and demand problems. Supply problems: No New Refineries: As reported by The Reason Foundation: A new oil refinery has not been built in the United States since 1976. During that time, our gasoline use has increased over 25 percent. The nation's 149 existing refineries have been running at maximum capacity trying to meet record demand and, as a result, not only do we import oil, we actually have to import 10 percent of our daily gasoline from refineries overseas. Strikes in Ireland:As reported by the International Herald Tribune: Workers walked off the job Sunday at the only oil refinery in Scotland, requiring BP to close a pipeline that supplies about one-third of Britain's petroleum needs. The strike at the Ineos refinery in Grangemouth began at 6 a.m., after workers of the Unite union and management were unable to agree on proposed pension changes. It was set to run for 48 hours. A spokeswoman for Unite, who asked that her name not be used because she was not an elected official of the union, said about 1,200 workers walked out Sunday, and that it was "highly likely that there will be further strike dates if an agreement is not reached." Reformulating costs: Unfortunately, I don't have a citation for this one, but every summer and winter, gas companies change their mix slightly in order to help cars deal with the cold, as well as meet EPA standards. If someone who understands this process better feel free to do so in the comments section, but the major point is that it costs money to change the mix and the spring/summer/fall mix is more expensive. OPEC, OPEC, OPEC. If you want to know the real reason behind gas prices, look beyond Exxon/Mobil, BP, and Conoco. It's the single most effective legalized international cartel in the world. It is a conglomeration of the world's giant oil exporting countries (Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela.) Headquartered in Vienna, Austria, OPEC nations account for 2/3 of the world's known oil reserves and control 35.6% of the world's oil production. They meet yearly and decide the amount of oil they will produce and sell. They effectively control the supply curve and can shift it around (to the right) as much as they please and there ain't a single thing we could do about it. The US companies happen to be reaping the rewards of what OPEC is giving them in artificially low supply. By the way, if you are caught doing this in this country (or any other democratic one), you would get nailed with a class action antitrust lawsuit before you could say “RAM” Demand Problems: Summer driving season: lets face it, people, kids get out of school, we travel more often, and as a result, we need more gas. SUVs: For many years now, the auto companies have duped us into believing that we need to have 4-wheel drive and a suburban that seats 8 but is occupied by one. These vehicles of course are completely unnecessary for most people that need to commute around town, and happen to guzzle up more fuel than any other vehicle class. Even trucks get better mileage. And if you have a Hummer or an H2, you a.)deserve the “N/A” city mileage rating and b.) are melting a glacier per tank. Get a car. Just get a car. So, with tight supply and high demand, of course the price of gas is high. This problem is compounded on top of the fact that while average worker wages have remained relatively flat since the late '90s, executive compensation has shot up by obscene amounts creating an income gap that restricts the buying power of working class Americans but lets the rich live as if there is no problem. And you are going to solve all of this with a gas tax holiday? The best part is, of course that Hillary can say all of this without having to act. This congress is so deadlocked they can't pass a minimum wage increase without adding in tax breaks, how are they going to take on big oil? And forget about Bush signing that law. He'd rather keep waving his magic wand. So Hillary gets to promote a solution that she will never implement. Solutions for America! The fact is that you can't fix the problem of high gas prices with a short term reduction. The invisible hand will continue to move prices up while regular Americans keep burning up their wallet. The solution is a multilayered strategy that requires environmentalists along with oil and auto companies to make some short-term concessions to achieve a long-term goal of energy independence. Build new refineries. This is the concession the environmental groups will have to make. In the short-term, it is the easiest way to break the bottleneck of price spikes when a hurricaine whipes out the refineries in the gulf coast, or workers go on strike, or the million other reasons refineries close. Continue to force Detroit and Japan to raise CAFE standards. This is the middle-term solution that we have begun and that the market is already beginning to demand anyways. If cars don't use as much gas then you don't need fuel as much. The catch of course is that manufacturing processes need to be green as well. I have heard stories of materials making a trip around the world to be turned into cars. More research is needed. Maybe another blog post sometime... Ethanol. This is a VERY short term fix in my view. With world food shortages, corn is going out if style as a source of fuel. Wood chips require us to cut down more trees. That doesn't sound attractive. Switchgrass is a slightly longer-term solution though, but in the end, I don't think ethanol can take us very far on its own. It is a stepping stone though. Get tough with OPEC. It's time to go to the WTO and other international trade organizations and get OPEC nations to stop their collusion and allow the free market to do its work. This takes a president that is not complicit in matters of “free” trade. Frankly, Hillary isn't too promising to me here. The long term solution of course is to have a nation that doesn't use oil at all. That likely means cars powered on water (I have to stress, though, as someone who is closely connected to the water industry in this state(my dad has had a career in water) SALT WATER is the operative solution. Of we can't do salt water we might as well walk away from that idea now), but i'm open to suggestions. The longest term solution: ending income inequity in this country. Our top priority ought to be restoring balance in the pay ratio between executives and workers. It is the single most effective way to protect against any economic turmoil. When the middle class does well, the nation does well, and the American dream is achievable. The means to this end are enough for its own post, but suffice to say this is easily doable. So no, I don't support a gas tax holiday. |
|
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Sunday, 04 May 2008 |
|
Nice ink on NDSU punter trying out for the Pats... The Patriots will have a three-way competition at punter for the second year in a row, as they signed rookie free agent Mike Dragosavich yesterday. The 6-foot-5-inch, 212-pound Dragosavich arrived Thursday for a tryout, and the Patriots were impressed with what they saw in minicamp, as the North Dakota State product nearly took out some light fixtures in the Dana-Farber Field House with his skyscraping punts. "Mike is pretty athletic. He is a tall guy, so he is long and can generate some pretty good leg speed," said coach Bill Belichick, who compared Dragosavich to former Giants punter Dave Jennings. [ ] The personable Dragosavich left quite a mark at Division 2 North Dakota, both for his punting and humorous ad-lib dance during a basketball game that has made the rounds on YouTube. Boston.com
Sorry. I couldn't find the YouTube dance video. (Google "janitor dancing halftime" for numerous references...) But, if it's any consolation, here's some draft info on Dragosavich. |
|
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Sunday, 04 May 2008 |
|
Okay, this isn't really a diversion. But it's good. By request. |
|
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Saturday, 03 May 2008 |
|
Go... horses! Update: Adam-The actual race! |
|
|
Written by Chet
|
|
Friday, 02 May 2008 |
|
This has been around for a while but I suspect few of you have ever seen or heard this. If you have, let me know. Joe Republican
Day in the Life of Joe Middle-Class Republican
by John Gray
Joe gets up at 6:00am to prepare his morning coffee. He fills his pot full of good clean drinking water because some liberal fought for minimum water quality standards. He takes his daily medication with his first swallow of coffee. His medications are safe to take because some liberal fought to insure their safety and work as advertised.
All but $10.00 of his medications are paid for by his employers medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance, now Joe gets it too. He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs this day. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.
Joe takes his morning shower reaching for his shampoo; His bottle is properly labeled with every ingredient and the amount of its contents because some liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained. Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some tree hugging liberal fought for laws to stop industries from polluting our air. He walks to the subway station for his government subsidized ride to work; it saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees. You see, some liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.
Joe begins his work day; he has a good job with excellent pay, medicals benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe's employer pays these standards because Joe's employer doesn't want his employees to call the union. If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed he'll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some liberal didn't think he should lose his home because of his temporary misfortune.
Its noon time, Joe needs to make a Bank Deposit so he can pay some bills. Joe's deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the depression.
Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae underwritten Mortgage and his below market federal student loan because some stupid liberal decided that Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his life-time.
Joe is home from work, he plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive to dads; his car is among the safest in the world because some liberal fought for car safety standards. He arrives at his boyhood home. He was the third generation to live in the house financed by Farmers Home Administration because bankers didn't want to make rural loans. The house didn't have electric until some big government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't belong and demanded rural electrification. (Those rural Republican's would still be sitting in the dark)
He is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad lives on Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to. After his visit with dad he gets back in his car for the ride home.
He turns on a radio talk show, the host's keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. (He doesn't tell Joe that his beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe enjoys throughout his day) Joe agrees, "We don't need those big government liberals ruining our lives; after all, I'm a self made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have".
I think John Gray's story is a pretty good start, but it leaves out a few things. He leaves out the public schools Republicans want to eliminate (or shrink to the point where they can be drown in a bathtub). He leaves out the public roads and highways that Republicans would like to see turned into privately maintained toll roads. He leaves out farm programs that have allowed some family farmers to survive. Joe's brother also gets a fair price for his grain because some liberal -- no; some crazy socialist -- created the North Dakota State Mill & Elevator. He's able to put his crop in the ground because some liberal set up fed-guaranteed farm lending program, with George W. Bush threatening a veto all along. Joe's brother's family farming operation made it through last year's hail storm/drought/etc. because some liberal insisted we have federally subsidized crop insurance programs. If you've got other ideas to add to Joe's world, feel free to fill them in. I'm hoping some right-wing nuts will stop in to make sure I know that Social Security (if not adjusted slightly) will be collapsing (in 50 to 75 years), and that if we didn't have to pay taxes to fund public _______________ (fill in blank with roads, schools, or whatever), taxes could be lowered and rich people could all afford to pay for better private _____________ (fill in blank with roads, schools, or whatever). And I'm sure they'll tell us that the market would force factories to clean up the smoke billowing out of their smoke stacks and the sludge pumped into our rivers after half the people died from cancer, because the factory owners would recognize their profits were declining because they were killing off all their customers. ... yadda, yadda, yadda... We've all heard those arguments before. But go ahead and repeat them in the comments anyway. Thanks (in advance). |
|
|
Written by Adam
|
|
Thursday, 01 May 2008 |
A little story from my neck of the woods in The Forum this evening: A $9,000 makeover of Cass County’s patrol vehicles is done, and Sheriff Paul Laney has his name all over it. Seriously. The four-month venture was completed Wednesday when the last of 14 marked vehicles received a new logo that displays an exact replica of Laney’s badge, he said. The department used funds in its budget to update the vehicles with the office’s new leader and new look at law enforcement, Laney said. “We want our cars to also simulate that look,” he said. Fargo Forum What?!?! Are you kidding me? The article goes on... Laney has made headlines since being elected for tactics such as his high-profile stings. A fake party before the Ozzy Osborne-Rob Zombie concert was put on by PDL productions – a bogus company Paul D. Laney created. The sheriff estimated in January 2007 that the county spent almost $8,000 on his transition into office. The cost included such things new uniforms and business cards. Laney was first approached about getting new vehicle logos when he took office in January 2007, but said he decided to wait. “I don’t go in and change things just automatically to change them,” he said. Fargo Forum I can't believe this guy agreed to do an interview. He wants to do this all to reflect the “image” of a cool change in leadership, which he spent a lot of money over two election cycles to defeat. The thing that annoys me most: when we finally vote Laney out of office (hopefully this year) we will have to spend another ten grand to take his name off of the vehicles. What happened to being a nation of laws and not men? Where did that go? |
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| | Results 1 - 20 of 438 | |
|