ndert2
Follow us on Facebook

Latest Comments

Calendar of Events

**************

Eating Liberally -- The 4th Thursday of each month -- Valentino's, 1443 42nd St Sw, Fargo, ND -- 6:00 p.m.

This is  a time to get together and eat and talk , just time for  our friends.   There is no format, dues, agenda etc.,   We can meet anytime or place we decide, picnic pot luck,  local food, anything we want to, even invite  speakers.  But for now please show up, eat and talk to like minded friends.  No need to RSVP just stop by and eat. email Trana if you like.

************

Anybody got anything that's interesting for me?

ND Outdoors Sites

FishingBuddy
NoDakOutdoors

Featured Link

Meanwhile

Login Form



Support NorthDecoder

Search This Site

Loading

Feature Stories

Personal
The Low Road

Amazon Search

JoomlaWatch 1.2.12 - Joomla Monitor and Live Stats by Matej Koval
ND K-12 Education Hardest Hit By Sequestration PDF Print E-mail
Written by Chet   

schoolAccording to a report from the Pew Charitable Trust's "Stateline" website, North Dakota's K-12 education funding is likely to be among the hardest hit by sequestration in the United States, if not the hardest hit.  

Automatic federal budget cuts will slash more than $1 billion in K-12 education dollars this year, paring everything from Title I money for low-income students to school improvement initiatives.

The reductions in K-12 spending, part of the 5 percent across-the-board reductions in non-defense spending known as sequestration, will be particularly painful in North Dakota,  Mississippi, New Mexico, Idaho and South Dakota—the five states that rely most heavily on federal education money.

On average, federal dollars comprise about 13 percent of states’ K-12 education spending. But in those five states, one fifth or more of K-12 money came from Washington, D.C. in fiscal year 2010, the most recent year for which data is available from the National Center for Education Statistics. North Dakota gets 22 percent of its education money from the federal government, while the other four states receive around 20 percent.

PewStates.org [emphasis added]

So of the five states that receive their education money from the federal government, four get 20% but North Dakota gets 22%. That's a big portion of our total K-12 funding, when you consider the average amount states get is 13% of their funding from the federal government. 

If you know anything about where education funding comes from, you know this is relevant to many issues being addressed in North Dakota right now. Over the years most education funding has come from property taxes. Some of the property tax burden has been absorbed by the state because of aggressive policy pushes by Democrats, but the sequester is obviously a set back. When you hear the Governor and other elected officials talk about how much money they're putting into K-12 education, keep in mind they're just putting back into k-12 education some of what their friends in Washington -- Kevin Cramer and the other Teabaggers -- have taken away through obstructionism and game playing.

Most reasonable people agree America's federal taxation system needs to be adjusted so that the wealthiest people and corporations are paying their fair share, because they are not right now. They also agree, importantly, that smart spending cuts can and should be found. But the sequester takes an axe-cutting approach to something that should be done with a scalpel.

We still deserve better.

 


Comments (12)add comment

random said:

...
Tony Bender is the best. He hits the nail on the head again.
 
March 10, 2013
Votes: +0

random said:

March 10, 2013
Votes: +1

Jason said:

Which is exactly...
Why there needs to be a flat tax with NO deductions. Everyone pay their fair share. The same percentage as everyone else. And why school funding should be done at the state level and NOT the federal level.
 
March 12, 2013
Votes: +1

nimrodent said:

...
Flat tax, flat-earth, know-nothings unite! Join Americans for the Koch Bros' Prosperity!
 
March 13, 2013
Votes: +0

Jason said:

I don't get it
Why do we need to tax someone for being successful? Why not the same tax percentage for everyone?
 
March 14, 2013
Votes: +0

nimrodent said:

March 14, 2013
Votes: -1

Jason said:

...
So no argument? No discussion? It's funny when a real question is posed if you don't have an argument you just act a fool.
 
March 14, 2013
Votes: +0

Chet said:

Personally...
I can't speak for anybody else here, Jason, but I'll tell you that I, personally, can't take anybody seriously if they say they support a flat tax. I could probably just say "Herman Cain was a flat tax guy" and end it at that, but I'll give you a little bit more.

Progressives, generally, are capitalists, but, unlike today's conservatives, we also believe in fairness and justice. What we struggle with is the conservative view that everybody gets equal value out of the economic system within which our government allows us to operate. Poor people wear out our highways just as much as oil companies. The fry cook at McDonalds uses the court system as much as the collection agency CEO. The hotel maid uses the municipal airport as much as the investment banker.

But just as important is that rich people need poor people more than poor people need rich people. Say, for discussion's sake, everybody truly had the exact same opportunities in life (something I suspect we could both agree isn't true), and so everybody in America became a billionaire. Who would work the cash register at WalMart? Who would dry your car off at the end of the car wash? Who would bring you your Moons Over My Hammy at Denny's?

The answer is "nobody." Our economy relies quite heavily on having "haves" and "have-nots." The "haves" get exponentially more benefit -- many, through hard work and innovation (but some, not) -- and so, in a just world, they should pay exponentially more in taxes.

Robert Reich has a pretty good explanation of the "flat tax fraud" that you might want to read, too. Click here to read his take, which I generally agree with.
 
March 14, 2013
Votes: +2

nimrodent said:

...
Or, Jason, you can just keep flaming on in disregard of the facts, like always.
 
March 15, 2013
Votes: +0

Jason said:

...
Perhaps we could do a tiered flat tax. Those making from X amount to X amount pay 15% FLAT no deductions. Those making X to X pay 20% FLAT no deduction, etc.

Chet this is the first time you have calmly and non-insultingly responded to a post of mine. I appreciate that. If Republicans and Democrats could have discussions without name calling and stupid statements (a.k.a. Nimrodent) I think more could be done.

I think just making the tax system easier would bring in more income to the government. I do believe that all people, Poor and Rich, should pay taxes.

I also think we need HUGE spending cuts. Taxes cannot make us solvent.
 
March 15, 2013
Votes: -1

nimrodent said:

The education of Jason -- Step 1:
Would a 17% sales tax on all passenger vehicles costing more than $35,000 be fair?
 
March 15, 2013
Votes: +1

Jason said:

Don't belittle me
If you want to talk, talk with respect.

No I don't think that a 17% tax is fair. But specifically we are talking about income tax. Not sales tax.
 
March 18, 2013
Votes: +0

Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy